top of page

Getting Started

Public·458 members

Refractive Index affected by salts

When I look at samples with elevated salt concentrations, like MgCl2 for example, I see what looks like TV static in the background. I see from a quick search that the salt is likely affecting the landing behavior and the refractive index contrast.


I'm curious if anyone has done a study of different salts at different concentrations that I could look to for guidance when doing sample prep? I don't want to burn through the consumables on something like that.


Thanks in advance for any help or insights!

40 Views
Austin Graves
5 days ago

Hi Mike,

Is your buffer just MgCl2 or does is it added to PBS? We have observed background noise coming from magnesium but this often occurs when the MgCl2 buffer is prepared in PBS.


At the moment we do not have a document that outlines the possible effects of different buffer components but I will certainly carry that feedback back to the team. Thanks!


Austin G.

26 Views

How necessary is a vibration table?

We originally purchased our OneMP with a vibration table (Everstill K-400) and have always used the table during measurements. Over the past couple weeks, though, I’ve tested making measurements with the table off and have noticed no difference in the recordings. In fact, I was able to obtain an accurate reading of a 40-50 kDa sample quite well (an exceedingly clean glass and PBS blank helped). Does the apparent lack of impact of the table on measurement accuracy simply mean that the bench where our device rests is solid enough to not warrant a table? 

 

I should also note that, when the table is on, I always notice that even light taps to the work surface are observable in the blue trace in the radial profile monitor, making me suspect the table’s antivibration efficacy. But I later understood this to be normal as the table is intended only to…

118 Views
Amy Chau
Aug 27

Hi Chase,


If turning off the anti-vibration table doesn't affect the focus position fluctuation, it means your bench is very solid! You're correct that the anti-vibration table only counteracts building vibrations or low frequencies from nearby equipment. We still wouldn't recommend leaning against the bench, or tapping the table as these actions introduce vibrations that can't be isolated by the anti-vibration table.


Amy

Sr. FAS

Are gaps in the focus ring really a problem?

At the initial training for our OneMP, I was told that gaps in the focus ring due to air bubbles in the objective oil were detrimental and should be removed prior to a measurement by lifting then resettling the coverslip. I recently made a measurement with gaps in the ring and it appeared to be fine. Can you explain how gaps in the focus ring affect measuring accuracy?

100 Views
Amy Chau
Aug 27

Hi Chase,


Bubbles have different refractive index than oil, which causes light to bend differently than intended. This results in less light reaching to the particles of interest and reducing the amount of scattering from the particles. Since we capture the interference between particle scattering and background reflection, less scattering from particle caused by oil would reduce the interference, thus lower contrast and mass.


If it's a small gap in the autofocus ring, it's likely not a huge mass shift. If the gap gets wider (more bubble), you will likely see a bigger shift. A simple test you can do is to measure the sample before and after introducing bubble to the oil. Move some oil to a microcentrifuge tube and shake it to add bubbles.


If you noticed your measurements tend to create gaps in the autofocus ring, you can heat the oil at 60 C for 2-8 hours and then cool to room temperature.


Amy

Sr. FAS

bottom of page